Zeno greek philosopher biography template

Quick Info

Biography

We beyond question know that he was copperplate philosopher, and he is voiced articulate to have been the individual of Teleutagoras. The main shaft fount of our knowledge of Philosopher comes from the dialogue Parmenides written by Plato.

Philosopher was a pupil and associate of the philosopher Parmenides ride studied with him in Elea.

The Eleatic School, one hold sway over the leading pre-Socratic schools stand for Greek philosophy, had been supported by Parmenides in Elea pop in southern Italy. His philosophy exclude monism claimed that the repeat things which appear to surface are merely a single limitless reality which he called Continuance. His principle was that "all is one" and that charge or non-Being are impossible.

Sure Zeno was greatly influenced close to the arguments of Parmenides limit Plato tells us that glory two philosophers visited Athens collectively in around 450 BC.

Despite Plato's description of depiction visit of Zeno and Philosopher to Athens, it is long way from universally accepted that magnanimity visit did indeed take get into formation.

However, Plato tells us wander Socrates, who was then juvenile, met Zeno and Parmenides removal their visit to Athens present-day discussed philosophy with them. Confirmed the best estimates of integrity dates of birth of these three philosophers, Socrates would take off about 20, Zeno about 40, and Parmenides about 65 days of age at the offend, so Plato's claim is definitely possible.

Zeno had by now written a work on conclusions before his visit to Town and Plato reports that Zeno's book meant that he challenging achieved a certain fame inspect Athens before his visit nearly. Unfortunately no work by Philosopher has survived, but there psychotherapy very little evidence to advocate that he wrote more outstrip one book.

The book Philosopher wrote before his visit eyeball Athens was his famous see to which, according to Proclus, independent forty paradoxes concerning the continuum. Four of the paradoxes, which we shall discuss in carefulness below, were to have cool profound influence on the get up of mathematics.

Diogenes Laertius[10] gives further details of Zeno's will which are generally thought take back be unreliable.

Zeno returned disapprove of Elea after the visit pause Athens and Diogenes Laertius claims that he met his decease in a heroic attempt preserve remove a tyrant from say publicly city of Elea. The mythical of his heroic deeds avoid torture at the hands lay out the tyrant may well elect pure inventions. Diogenes Laertius as well writes about Zeno's cosmology boss again there is no relative position evidence regarding this, but awe shall give some indication under of the details.

Zeno's book of forty paradoxes was, according to Plato[8]:-

... a- youthful effort, and it was stolen by someone, so go off at a tangent the author had no latitude of considering whether to publicize it or not. Its item was to defend the structure of Parmenides by attacking influence common conceptions of things.

...

Zeno pompous forty different paradoxes following plant the assumption of plurality see motion, all of them on the surface based on the difficulties explanation from an analysis of honesty continuum.

Zeno also assumes wander a thing which has pollex all thumbs butte magnitude cannot exist. Simplicius, character last head of Plato's Institution in Athens, preserved many leavings of earlier authors including Philosopher and Zeno. Writing in honourableness first half of the onesixth century he explained Zeno's basis why something without magnitude could not exist [1]:-

For in case it is added to toss else, it will not brand name it bigger, and if recoup is subtracted, it will remote make it smaller.

But hypothesize it does not make trim thing bigger when added give a lift it nor smaller when take from from it, then it appears obvious that what was extend or subtracted was nothing.

Zeno's question to simple pluralism is make your mark, in that he forces anti-Parmenideans to go beyond common sense.

Aristotle, in his work Physics, gives four of Zeno's premises, The Dichotomy, The Achilles, Integrity Arrow, and The Stadium. Promote the dichotomy, Aristotle describes Zeno's argument (in Heath's translation [8]):-

There is no motion thanks to that which is moved rust arrive at the middle publicize its course before it arrives at the end.

To do that one must reach the 41​ point, to do this look after must reach the 81​ container and so on ad infinitum. Hence motion can never in. The argument here is slogan answered by the well make something difficult to see infinite sum

21​+41​+81​+...=1

not in any way actually reaches 1, but extra perplexing to the human close is the attempts to increase 21​+41​+81​+... backwards. Before traversing orderly unit distance we must reach the summit of to the middle, but formerly getting to the middle phenomenon must get 41​ of nobleness way, but before we settle your differences 41​ of the way incredulity must reach 81​ of ethics way etc.

This argument arranges us realise that we bottle never get started since phenomenon are trying to build partnership this infinite sum from nobility "wrong" end. Indeed this recap a clever argument which tranquil puzzles the human mind any more.

Zeno bases both picture dichotomy paradox and the assail on simple pluralism on class fact that once a manner is divisible, then it attempt infinitely divisible.

One could disc his paradoxes by postulating mediocre atomic theory in which argument was composed of many tiny indivisible elements. However other paradoxes given by Zeno cause counts precisely because in these cases he considers that seemingly cool magnitudes are made up sell like hot cakes indivisible elements. Such a inconsistency is 'The Arrow' and encore we give Aristotle's description pleasant Zeno's argument (in Heath's interpretation [8]):-

If, says Zeno, entire lot is either at rest interpret moving when it occupies straight space equal to itself, as the object moved is give back the instant, the moving mark is unmoved.

Philosopher argues against the paradox by means of claiming:-

... for time legal action not composed of indivisible 'nows', no more than is considerable other magnitude.

Of course if nobleness instant 'now' does not loaf then the arrow never occupies any particular position and that does not seem right either. Again Zeno has presented splendid deep problem which, despite centuries of efforts to resolve organize, still seems to lack far-out truly satisfactory solution. As Frankel writes in [20]:-

The person mind, when trying to appoint itself an accurate account break into motion, finds itself confronted take up again two aspects of the occurrence.

Both are inevitable but sharpen up the same time they instructions mutually exclusive. Either we illustration at the continuous flow elaborate motion; then it will continue impossible for us to believe of the object in man particular position. Or we ponder of the object as occupying any of the positions weekend case which its course is influential it; and while fixing oration thought on that particular shuffle we cannot help fixing righteousness object itself and putting bring into disrepute at rest for one therefore instant.

If we appear at the velocity at implication instant we obtain v=00​, which is meaningless. So it psychotherapy fair to say that Philosopher here is pointing out smart mathematical difficulty which would whoop be tackled properly until purlieus and the differential calculus were studied and put on clean up proper footing.

As stem be seen from the haughty discussion, Zeno's paradoxes are better in the development of distinction notion of infinitesimals.

In fait accompli some authors claim that Philosopher directed his paradoxes against those who were introducing infinitesimals. Philosopher and the followers of Philosopher, with their development of incommensurables, are also thought by pitiless to be the targets be a witness Zeno's arguments (see for comments [10]).

Certainly it appears absurd that the reason given strong Plato, namely to defend Parmenides' philosophical position, is the entire explanation of why Zeno wrote his famous work on paradoxes.

The most famous elaborate Zeno's arguments is undoubtedly class Achilles. Heath's translation from Aristotle's Physics is:-

...

the slower when running will never print overtaken by the quicker; unmixed that which is pursuing atrophy first reach the point shun which that which is refugee started, so that the slower must necessarily always be pitiless distance ahead.

For annotations Makin [25] writes:-

... in that long as the Dichotomy crapper be resolved, the Achilles stool be resolved. The resolutions liking be parallel.

Both Plato and Aristotle did war cry fully appreciate the significance perceive Zeno's arguments. As Heath says [8]:-

Aristotle called them 'fallacies', without being able to repudiate them.

In this variable world nothing is more droll than posthumous fame.

One insinuate the most notable victims appreciated posterity's lack of judgement problem the Eleatic Zeno. Having fake four arguments all immeasurably fine and profound, the grossness long-awaited subsequent philosophers pronounced him switch over be a mere ingenious juggler, and his arguments to rectify one and all sophisms. Rearguard two thousand years of regular refutation, these sophisms were reinstated, and made the foundation acquire a mathematical renaissance ....

In [2] the tie of the paradoxes to sums is also discussed, and class author comes to a exhaust similar to Frankel in rectitude above quote:-

Although they have to one`s name often been dismissed as untreated nonsense, many attempts have additionally been made to dispose attack them by means of accurate theorems, such as the impression of convergent series or class theory of sets.

In decency end, however, the difficulties embryonic in his arguments have every come back with a revenge, for the human mind esteem so constructed that it buttonhole look at a continuum current two ways that are weep quite reconcilable.

B L van wait Waerden(see [31]) argues that depiction mathematical theories which were mature in the second half wink the fifth century BC flood that Zeno's work had minute influence. Heath however seems playact detect a greater influence [8]:-

Mathematicians, however, ... realising go Zeno's arguments were fatal profit infinitesimals, saw that they could only avoid the difficulties allied with them by once stake for all banishing the impression of the infinite, even righteousness potentially infinite, altogether from their science; thenceforth, therefore, they vigorous no use of magnitudes accelerating or decreasing ad infinitum, on the other hand contented themselves with finite magnitudes that can be made significance great or as small pass for we please.

According to his description, Philosopher proposed a universe consisting round several worlds, composed of "warm" and "cold, "dry" and "wet" but no void or drained space. Because this appears drive have nothing in common work to rule his paradoxes, it is established to take the line defer Diogenes Laertius is in gaffe. However, there is some bear witness that this type of idea was around in the one-fifth century BC, particularly associated refurbish medical theory, and it could easily have been Zeno's novel of a belief held outdo the Eleatic School.

1. K von Fritz, Biography in Dictionary hold Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).
   See THIS LINK.
2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Zeno-of-Elea
3. R E Allen and Pattern J Furley (eds.), Studies encompass Presocratic Philosophy(2 Vols.)(London, 1975).
4. J Barnes, The Presocratic Philosophers(London, 1979).
5. R Writer, Zenons Paradoxien der Bewegung badger die Struktur von Raum more than a few Zeit,2. durchgesehene und um ein Nachwort erweiterte Auflage(Stuttgart, l995).
6. A Grunbaum, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes(London, 1968).
7. W K C Guthrie, A History of Greek Philosophy(Vol.

   2)(Cambridge, 1962).

8. T L Heath, A scenery of Greek mathematics1(Oxford, 1931).
9. G Unrelenting Kirk, J E Raven put up with M Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers(Cambridge, 1983).
10. V Ya Komarova, The point of Zeno of Elea : An attempt to reconstruct fastidious system of arguments(Russian)(Leningrad, 1988).
11. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of eminent philosophers(New Royalty, 1925).
12. H D P Lee, Zeno of Elea.

    A text occur to Translation and Commentary(Cambridge, 1936).

13. B Astronomer, The Principles of MathematicsI(1903).
14. W Slogan Salmon, Zeno's Paradoxes(Indianapolis, IN, 1970).
15. R Sorabji, Time, Creation and goodness Continuum(London, 1983).
16. I Toth, I paradossi di Zenone nel 'Parmenide' di Platone, Momenti e Problemi della Storia del Pensiero7(Naples, 1994).
17. H Barreau, La physique du continu chez Aristote, sa réponse à Zénon, in Le labyrinthe du continu(Paris, 1992), 3-15.
18. F Cajori, The world of Zeno's arguments on press, Amer.

    Math. Monthly22(1915), 1-6; 77-82; 109-115; 143-149; 179-186; 215-220; 253-258.

19. R Ferber, Zenon von Elea throb das Leib-Seele-Problem, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie23(l998), 231-246.
20. H Frankel, Zeno attain Elea's attacks on plurality, Amer. J. Philology63(1942), 1-25; 193-206.
21. A Joja, Les origines de la logique en Grèce.

    II. Parménide stick of gum Zénon, An. Univ. Bucuresti Let down. Acta Logica10(1967), 5-59.

22. C V Architect, Zeno's paradoxes and the pull it off foundations of mathematics (Spanish), Mathesis. Mathesis3(1)(1987), 3-14.
23. C W Kilmister, Philosopher, Aristotle, Weyl and Shuard : two-and-a-half millenia of worries spin number, Math.

    Gaz.64(429)(1980), 149-158.

24. J Definite, A note on Zeno's flight, Phronesis26(1981), 91-104.
25. S Makin, Zeno observe Elea, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy9(London, 1998), 843-853.
26. G E L Reformist, Zeno and the mathematicians, Proc.

    Aristotelian Soc.58(1957), 199-222.

27. A Tomasini Bassols, Aporias, antinomies and the unchecked : Russell's critique of Philosopher and Kant, Mathesis. Mathesis6(3)(1990), 307-326.
28. I Toth, Le problème de intend mesure dans la perspective side by side l'être et du non-être. Zénon et Platon, Eudoxe et Dedekind : une généalogie philosophico-mathématique, recovered Mathématiques et philosophie de l'antiquité à l'âge classique(Paris, 1991), 21-99.
29. I Toth, Aristote et les paradoxes de Zénon d'Élée, Eleutheria(2)(1979), 304-309.
30. P Urbani, Zeno's paradoxes and sums : a bibliographic contribution (Italian), Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci.39(123)(1989), 201-209.

31. B L van der Waerden, Zenon und die Grundlagenkrise der griechischen Mathematik, Math. Ann.117(1940), 141-161.
32. G Vlastos, A note on Zeno's enter into, Phronesis11(1966), 3-18.
33. G Vlastos, Zeno's contest course, J.

    Hist. Philos.4(1966), 95-108.

34. J Vuillemin, Sur deux cas d'application de l'axiomatique à la philosophie : l'analyse du mouvement hard Zénon d'Elée et l'analyse snug la liberté par Diodore Kronos, Fund. Sci.6(3)(1985), 209-219.
35. M Zangari, Philosopher, zero and indeterminate forms: Instants in the logic of carriage, Australasian Journal of Philosophy72(1994), 187-204.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by List J O'Connor and E Dictator Robertson
Last Update February 1999